My on-off love/hate/indifference affair with Jenna Jameson is on the upswing thanks to her talent for making the news regarding items which are clearly fictional. The odds on Scarlett Johansen playing her in a movie, which any second-grader could fact-check after watching a single episode of Entourage, are zero.
Putting aside that actresses in Johansen’s position get better offers than Jenna’s from guys in bars, the idea of the movie is ridiculous. What was the last successful biopic about a living celebrity under 40? Even with major studio support Jenna’s need to be portrayed in a favorable light will mean the end result is slightly less believable than her chest. If she want’s to make the porno equivalent of Rocky it’ll be more believable if it’s not supposed to feature someone so many people know so much about.
Further proof of her likely delusion comes In a recent interview in which Jenna accuses the best porn film ever, Boogie Nights, of being unrealistic. I can only suspect she hasn’t read her own biography. What does Jenna who started young, is much feted, was drug addicted, and is unable to hold-down a relationship not believe about the story of Dirk “John Holmes” Diggler who started young, was drug addicted and proved unable to hold-down a relationship? Jenna’s clever but surely not stupid enough to think she can unwrite a history that so many people are part of and much of which is recorded?
I think she should acknowledge her iconhood be re-recording a version of ‘The Touch’ with a nicely done aircore video in time for ‘Transformers 2′.
Meanwhile If anyone’s taking odds on Jenna’s movie staring no one more important than the lead singer of the Pussycat Dolls please contact me.