The #1 search for Boobies is, logically, Rate My Boobies.
(I was… er… searching for this guy I know called Bobby and mistyped… That’s it.)
I clicked through to their top 20 page expecting to be awed by some of the most impressive personalities on the web but instead I got this. According to Rate My Boobies these zitty horrors (a staff favorite no less) are the finest mams on the web.
What’s going on? Is approximately round and under fifty passe? Who the hell’s doing the voting here?
If you can do better feel free to email me. This has ruined my day.
Looks like the same fine folks also offer a “rate my boner” page. Doesn’t even bear thinking about, does it?
Even as a “post what they give us” page this was truly scary. Had to pass it along, didn’t you?
I’ve been on the rate my boner page… it’s not bad. Though obviously not all penises are pleasant to look at.
Ditto breasts. I think you’re being overly harsh here Sam; and body fascistic too. Perhaps the democratic nature of this site means that real (rather than ‘porno’) tits are shown. You know, breasts that sag, that have stretch marks, heck, even breasts that occasionally are not blemish-free. That’s what you get with a woman not part-built from silicone; that’s the reality of real bodies as opposed to some narrow-focussed perception of what ‘beauty’ or ’sexual attractiveness’ is.
If you just want some firm, perk, young, silicone enhanced mammaries, I’m sure you can find them amongst the other 99.9% of imagery that supposedly represents women out there (including, it has to be said, the adverts you carry on this blog). If however, you want a real woman, perhaps you should allow for some of what you see not to be to your tastes - and perhaps look a little deeper to find something to excite you.
Sorry for the harsh criticism: I just felt your position on this was quite sexist; and seems to (disappointingly) support the hegemony and negative propaganda of ‘perfection’ that women are supposed to attain - something I thought you, of all people, would want to challenge (?)
Zitty horrors? Come on, Sam. We can’t all have the kind of time to properly moisturize and exfoliate our tits that you do.
Honestly I saw the Top 20 and I didn’t see the problem. Actually as an avid lover of fem-titty, I relished the variety. I get bored staring at breasts, faces, and bodies that all look the same no matter how objectively attractive they are. For some of us perfection does not lie in monotony.
Marcus - Rate my boner? No.
Girl - Facist? Sure, me and Hitler are like THAT!
I know plenty of women with beautiful breasts who aren’t porn stars (and who don’t feel the need to get them out in public.) Pretending there’s no middle ground between silicone and National Geographic is condescending and it is does a disservice to all the really beautiful/smart/talented/athletic people out there. Pretending Brad Pitt’s body isn’t more aesthetically pleasing to the majority than Dick Cheney’s is simply wrong and pretending the only people with great bodies have had surgery or are vapid morons is unfair.
Real women are beautiful but equating real and ugly doesn’t do anyone a favor. We’re not all equally attractive or smart and I’m not going to pretend we are because the alternative is some people having to realize their less perfect than they want to be.
Sexism is discriminating against women as a group - which I’m not doing. Noting there’s a difference between average and exceptional shouldn’t hurt anyone’s feelings and if it does they should examine their ego.
I’m not a ‘Gold stars for everyone’ kind of guy and ultimately I don’t think working that way helps anyone.
As for a narrow view of ‘beauty’ that’s universal. If you have a view of ‘beauty’ that encompasses everything you haven’t understood the word. Like genius ‘beauty’ is narrow by definition. Our descriptions may differ but no one’s can be too wide else it becomes meaningless.
I have just been lucky enough to spend some time with Cate Blanchett and she’s beautiful. More beautiful than 90% of people I know. Tell me I’m wrong. I dare you.
HA! FIRE UP THE GAS CHAMBERS FRITZ! BRING ME ZE BRITISHERS!
Sabrina - I see your point but I could see chests like that anywhere. Isn’t the internet for the stuff you can’t easily find?
Women needn’t worry, you’re more than a pair of tits in the same way us guys are more than a cock - though it’d be equally dumb to pretend a crooked 5 incher was the ‘best’ of man-meat. I’m just looking for some standards…
Sam, your friend Danni is a good example of what beautiful breasts look like, even in the post-teen years. My objection is to the idea that these biker chiks cum military wives somehow represent the best the web has to offer, even when you take age and real versus silicone into account. How can anybody run a page pretending to show the best breasts on the net and not include Betty B, or Danni, or any of a number of older, still real ladies?
Are saggy breasts attractive? I’m a Ron White fan, and as he says, if a 70 year old woman walks up to me in a bar and asks if I want to see her breasts, I say “Yeah I do. OK, you can roll them back up now.” Yes, they can. But we demean those women who take such exceptional care of themselves as to look amazing at 35, or 40, or even at 50 or up, by pretending that only the knee bamgers are attractive.
I’m in my late 40’s, and I’m not out there posting my equipment on the “Rate my boner” page. I ain’t had no complaints, but I know I’m not Rocco Siffredi or Peter North.
Just my humble opinion.
Marcus - What you said.
Beauty is an unfairly distributed gift which you can do little to work for. It’s worth celebrating, not wishing away with doublespeak and accusations of ‘no fair’ when less is presented as more.