According to practitioners of Christian Domestic Discipline:
A Christian Domestic Discipline marriage is one that is set up according to Biblical standards; that is, the husband is the authority in the household. The wife is submissive to her husband as is fit in the Lord and her husband loves her as himself. He has the ultimate authority in his household, but it is tempered with the knowledge that he must answer to God for his actions and decisions. He has the authority to spank his wife for punishment, but in real CDD marriages this is taken very seriously and usually happens only rarely. CDD is so much more than just spanking. It is the husband loving the wife enough to guide and teach her, and the wife loving the husband enough to follow his leadership. A Christian marriage embodies true romance and a Christian man a true hero.
A cynic might say telling a woman she exists to cook, fuck and get spanked in the service of God - who on earth is conveniently delegating all discipline and pleasure to her husband - could be perverted by crazy people with less than Godly intentions. How the hell do these guys pull this off? I once told a date I was getting text-messages from the Thundercats telling me to chain her to the bed and give her a rum and coke enema and she called the police. Maybe I should have invested in some crotchless pantaloons and set the mood properly?
(If you find and CDD porn you know where to send it)
(via Metafilter)
Much like some of the Mormon stuff, I love how you can take God out of those equations and suddenly it becomes a pretty sexy full-time D/s relationship.
“Crotchless pantaloons.” Once again, the internet gives me more knowledge than I ever wanted or needed.
That may have been a prank from the Silverhawks… The T-Cats are strictly vanilla coffee.
This crap is taught in private “Christian” schools all over the backwoods parts of the Bible Belt, and all over Utah.
I used to spank my ex regularly, but if I’d tried to claim that I had a God-given right to do so she’d have carved out my own tripes and served them to me for breakfast.
Seems to me one more argument for making fundamentalism a sexual perversion in the next edition of DSM. Inappropriate erotic objectification based on ancient Jewish fairy tales, anyone? Spank away, but at least have the brains to feel guilty about it, and don’t blame your spousal abuse on some imaginary old man in the sky.
Furry - Christianity, where sexy meets fucked up.
Chris - I got your email and checked. They have your size.
Edco - I suspect Moonstryker…
Marcus - I like your angle and can’t find a flaw. Any hint of non-consensual BDSM based on Jewish fairytales should be legal cause for incarceration based on mental instability.
Bah!
*shakes fist, and resists the urge to jump into a Thundercats/Silverhawks discussion*
Chris - By the power of greyskull just make your mind up.
Fine - Silverhawks sucked ass, had annoying voices, and was basically a ripoff of Thundercats (which is convenient, seeing as how they were made by the same people). Monstar’s verbal transformation was nearly identical to Mumm-ra’s (note: I’m too lazy to look up the correctly spelling), for example. Plus, the whole “replacing perfectly-healthy body parts for metal wings and shit” always bugged me.
Chris - You could be accused of overthinking this. not by me of course, but by other people…
I’ve had over 20 years to think about it - of course I’ve over-thought it! haha