We need a small team of experts for a project I’m working on. It’s not adult (I know - sad huh?) and there is equity on the table for the right people. A full-time commitment will be needed for at least 8-weeks, potentially leading to a more permanent position. Skills that pay the bills should be evident, though flashy resumes are less valuable than mad-skills and the right attitude.

The work involves implementing a web application that draws on a lot of current buzz-word friendly ideas in a novel way. We are trying to do something cool and if you’re the kind of person who’s always thinking of smarter, leaner ways to do things we’d like to hear from you. Yes it’s social, yes it’s video, no it’s not just another ‘rate this clip’ site.

We need at least one Flash developer with a good understanding of video (you should be able to do YouTube type stuff but, and I can’t overstress this, the job is not a YouTube clone) and we also need people capable of building a content management system. Finally a technically oriented designer/programmer who can generate standards compliant CSS/HTML as easily as breathing and who has a good grounding in AJAX will complete the gang (please note, designers who can’t produce data/user driven AJAX sites are lovely people but not right for this job - this isn’t about building pretty homepages).

Send cover letters and resumes to my email. Please let me know what you can do and provide links to examples of your work. Further detail will be provided on receipt of a signed non-disclosure agreement.

Applications from development teams are welcome, and please note this is an opportunity that’s being advertised in a number of other locations. Good luck.

Michelle Manhart.

In 2006 anyone who claims surprise when they’re kicked out of the Army Air Force for posing in Playboy is a fucktard.

However, if you’d like to see what it took Michelle Manhart to get ‘relieved of her duties’ I can help. I warn you, it’s dull.

(links removed at the request of Tatyana Cherkashina @ Playboy citing the DCMA)

Amazingly the press still pretends people in this position are surprised when they’re reprimanded thus feeding Playboy, and its models, the publicity they hoping for.

As for the military - Playboy hot training officers seems more like a recruiting tool than a cause of concern to me.

(NB: I know plastic surgery’s free to those who serve but are those falsies the best the Army can do? They look like cheap hamburger two pool balls in baloney socks)

Kirk Johnson has been revealad as the man behind the stomach-showing, email this to your friends, ‘Goatse’ image beloved of Shasty McNasty fans everywhere.

An unknown investigator, who we have to assumes a devotee of anal stretching, has managed to match the mole on Johnson’s mangina to that seen in the famous image solving one of the internet’s least troubling mysteries.

I’d link to the original goatse, if that could be done without looking at it. As it can’t, just Google it and steel yourself but you’ve seen it already so why go through that all again?

Looking at modern porn it’s obvious that a lot of people behind the camera think goatse-like images - gapes - are sexy. Maybe Kirk Johnson’s about to become a big, bright, shining, star…

This story is two days cold but such an egregious violation of common-sense it deserves to be highlighted and shamed away.

Teacher Faces 40 Years For In Class Porn Surfing, Blames Spyware

Aside from 40yrs being a sentence more fitting for someone who kill kids than one who shows them tits, where is there any evidence of harm? Admittedly, I wouldn’t want the girl I bought from Ukrainian gypsies who lives in my garage to see websites which might corrupt her, like stuff on lock-picking or nutrition, but I couldn’t justify charging someone who did as a criminal. The kids involved in this, seventh graders (12-13 years old) are probably interested in nothing more than why their nipples ache and where that hair comes from.

The teacher’s story sounds like a combination of lies and idiocy in an unknown proportion but forty years inside is a very high price to pay for stupidity.

In Episode 16 of “The Skeptics Guide to the Universe” Glenn G. Sparks, professor of communication at Purdue University discusses his detailed studies of violence in movies. He has found:

• Watching violence increases violent behavior in viewers
• Watching violence does not have a cathartic effect on viewers
• Violent films aren’t enjoyed more than non-violent ones
• The intensity of an emotion experienced while watching a movie is a direct function of the the emotion which precedes it, regardless of whether the emotions are similar in tone. I.e. the adrenaline released while watching violence enhances the emotions stirred by what follows it, whatever that might be, supporting the old adage, Fear - Death = Fun.

Assuming he’s right, does this affect the way anyone thinks about the ethics of violent pornography?

Neil Strauss, author of the pick-up guide ‘The Game‘, made his bones as a journalist and ghost author. For jizz-bizz followers he’s known as the guy who turned Jenna’s ‘…like, you-know, it was totally kinda…’ verbalizing into ‘How to Make Love Like a Porn Star ‘ for Regan Books in 2004.

Jenna’s book was controversial - at least before Regan Books head honcho Judith Regan tried to publish OJ’s ‘If I did it’ and then accused ‘the jews’ of ganging up on her, actions which ended her company.

‘How to Make Money Like a Porn Star‘ was Neil ‘Jew’ Strauss’s follow-up, a Jenna free graphic novel he felt qualified to write after his time on the wet-end of the porn industry.

‘Claudia’s Activity Book’ is a bizarre eight-page PDF produced as part of the marketing campaign for the title which I got sent this morning. It’s supposed to give potential readers a flavor of the book but makes it look as if Strauss was incapable of finding anything in porn not already believed by O’Reilly fans.

It’s the funniest thing I’ve seen today.

(Click image to enlarge ~ 780k)

As Strauss’s pick-up book sold-out and devolved into a cheesy love story, this document suggests HTMMLAPS is mired in conventional negativity (I guess I’ll never know because I don’t plan on paying for it). Anti-porn cliche from Jenna Jameson’s ghost author? As ironic as rain on your wedding day (or a free ride when you’ve already paid). Do you think she’s read it?

(Check out the Publisher’s Weekly review for an evisceration of the book worthy of Vlad the Impaler)

For all who claimed my criticism of Michelle Manhands Manhart’s tits was unfair, I present a pair of celebrity pair of breasts which, though connected to a woman who would couldn’t coax a dishonorable discharge from my soldier given the assistance of her mouth and mother, are a glorious example of the surgeon’s art.

$10,000 breasts are worth $10,000 because they look free.

The best of this weeks blogs by the bloggers who blog them. Highlighting the top 3 posts as voted for by Sugasm participants. Want in Sugasm #63? Submit a link to your best post of the week using this form.

This Week’s Picks
Slut (http://lafillemariee.blogspot.com)
“I fucked one man at the request of another, in exactly the way asked for. Then I reported what happened to the one who requested it.”

When Clients Look Like Relatives (http://radicalvixen.com/blog)
“I walked out the door, saw a man standing there and almost puked.”

Low Class Stripper? Classism and society’s view of adult entertainment (http://fullfrontalpolitics.com)
“For a lot of women sex work is a last-ditch option, something we all consider in the back of our minds when we’re growing up; we ask ourselves once or twice, if we needed the money, would we strip?”

Mr. Sugasm Himself
Playboy Soldiers (http://sugarbank.com)

Editors’ Choice
Where the Wild Things Are (http://kinkyfarmwife.blogspot.com)

More Sugasm
Join the Sugasm

This isn’t about to become a boob-log (okay, it might) but it is relevant, when discussing breast augmentation and other body mods (and implants are a body modification, just like splitting your tongue), to know the difference between real and fake.

A lot of people think Angelina Jolie has a big, plump, possibly plastic, pair of milkers. By the end of this post you’ll know she doesn’t and be able to amaze friends at dinner parties.

Make no mistake, I’d skin my parents and turn their hides into luggage if I thought it’d get me into to Angie’s tattooed peach-fish. She’s stunning. Even covered in body-art tributes to penis that isn’t mine and with a flock of Technicolor orphans in tow. I like her. A lot. In a pretty basic way.

Clockwise from top left, ‘Mr. & Mrs. Smith’, ‘Original Sin’, ‘Gia’ and ‘Fuck me I married a corpse’.

Please note that, though not flat chested, Ms. Jolie’s dugs have the heft and droop of natural breasts which have spent many hours unsupported.

The question of their naturalness is answered and betrayed by the ‘pancake effect’, the way her ‘happy taps’ disappear when she’s on her back. While natural breasts roll off to the side of a woman’s chest, falsies move up towards their owners shoulders. Angelina’s fall sideways and I put it to you, those tits are not saline.

In support of my first opinion I offer you Gia, her first big role (lower left hand corner), where we can see her ‘opinions’ have already been affected by gravity and droop when unsupported. Evidence she’s done nothing to change this ‘national geographic’ look is evident in the first frame, taken a decade later from ‘Mr. & Mrs. Smith’, where her jubblies compressibility (or fun-i-ness) is demonstrated by the way they submit to her corset. Were they ‘Transformers’, of silicone or saline, she would be forced to lace her corset less tightly, and if she did not, the hard line marking the edge of an implant would be visible under pressure.

Ladies and gentleman - there is no way this ladies breasts can be anything but flesh and blood and with that I end my presentation. I also suggest these same anylitic techniques can be used to determine the realness of any onscreen ‘bouncers’ you happen across. Questions?

I’d like to take a look at Joost but don’t want to wait. Could someone with access send me an invite? It’d make my day. I’ll blog on it too and you know that’s gonna be entertaining…