<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Media vs. Pornography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sugarbank.com/2006/08/13/the-media-vs-pornography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sugarbank.com/2006/08/13/the-media-vs-pornography/</link>
	<description>Pornographic Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:38:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vixen</title>
		<link>http://sugarbank.com/2006/08/13/the-media-vs-pornography/comment-page-1/#comment-6736</link>
		<dc:creator>Vixen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sugarbank.com/2006/08/13/the-media-vs-pornography/#comment-6736</guid>
		<description>Grrr...Someone do some digging on Anna Mikhailova and write an expose about her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grrr&#8230;Someone do some digging on Anna Mikhailova and write an expose about her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quinn</title>
		<link>http://sugarbank.com/2006/08/13/the-media-vs-pornography/comment-page-1/#comment-6731</link>
		<dc:creator>Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sugarbank.com/2006/08/13/the-media-vs-pornography/#comment-6731</guid>
		<description>I count myself lucky that I have parents and a spouse, and friends who don&#039;t care (and are even supportive) about the part of my life run under a pseudonym (or nomme de arte if I am feeling pretentious).  But there are more reasons to work under a different name than that.

I also have a day job, and do consulting on the side.  When someone Googles for my real name, I want them to focus on my role as a technologist, and expert on effectively managing outsourced teams.  At the same time when someone knows me as Quinn Retromodernist, I want them to focus on the work I do under that name.

And still there is this hanging sword.  What if I am outed?  Would it affect my life?  Would my day job support me or not? etc etc?

But it also seems like there is this underlying issue: My real name isn&#039;t any of your business, unless I choose to tell it to you, or I am committing fraud under an alias.  It&#039;s for this reason (and the worry of attached stigma) and I am disturbed by the outing of Ms Lee, and for the disturbing trend of Wikipedia articles on porn stars to contain their real name.

A case can be made that these are facts and fall within a journalist&#039;s pervue, but I also fail to see how they are relevant to the topics discussed.  It just seems damned rude...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I count myself lucky that I have parents and a spouse, and friends who don&#8217;t care (and are even supportive) about the part of my life run under a pseudonym (or nomme de arte if I am feeling pretentious).  But there are more reasons to work under a different name than that.</p>
<p>I also have a day job, and do consulting on the side.  When someone Googles for my real name, I want them to focus on my role as a technologist, and expert on effectively managing outsourced teams.  At the same time when someone knows me as Quinn Retromodernist, I want them to focus on the work I do under that name.</p>
<p>And still there is this hanging sword.  What if I am outed?  Would it affect my life?  Would my day job support me or not? etc etc?</p>
<p>But it also seems like there is this underlying issue: My real name isn&#8217;t any of your business, unless I choose to tell it to you, or I am committing fraud under an alias.  It&#8217;s for this reason (and the worry of attached stigma) and I am disturbed by the outing of Ms Lee, and for the disturbing trend of Wikipedia articles on porn stars to contain their real name.</p>
<p>A case can be made that these are facts and fall within a journalist&#8217;s pervue, but I also fail to see how they are relevant to the topics discussed.  It just seems damned rude&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
