I’m not a lawyer but I’m pretty sure that any presentation of explicit sexual material needs to be bookended with relevant 2257 information. Simply having a warning on a website’s not enough for video, it needs to run in the video itself. Hell, I have a 2257 warning tattooed below my navel just in case someone whips out a camera at a party.
If I’m right (and I almost always am) Tera’s new trailer website isn’t legal, and that mistake is enough to get Tera’s crew arrested by the Gonzale’s Porn-sicution Force.
If I’m wrong about this feel free to enlighten me. If I’m not, Tera needed to fix this yesterday.
If you just like to see fast cut money-shots set to nu-metal, get over there now and thank me for the link over a drink.
I was watching “Good Night, And Good Luck” last night; half a century elapsed - nothing has changed. The same for when I heard on “I Radio Chicago”, Lenny Bruce’s stand up. Censorship over intelligence. It’s all so sad here, this now, the redundancy. For what? A blanket for all, happy good time!!!
Reading on “Boogie’s Porn Blog” the next shoe is being dropped, it’s god damn idiots in parade. Albert Gonzales’s proposed mandatory web labeling law; source - CNN.com: “The Bush administration’s proposal would require commercial Web sites to place ‘marks and notices’ to be devised by the Federal Trade Commission on each sexually explicit page. The definition of sexually explicit broadly covers depictions of everything from sexual intercourse and masturbation to ’sadistic abuse’ and close-ups of fully clothed genital regions.” Sanity on vaction? Fully clothes women (bikinis and the like) can be labeled as evil. Fuck!
Lets all put on our blinders and smile real nice, think postitive thoughts, praise the power and our loyalty to God, but the RIGHT one, not the heathen one. Poor Cassandra, she weeps for us all. We so need Clark Kent on the job right now. Fuck.
http://www.boogie-blog.com/
Johnlan - that’s pretty scary legislation but, perhaps so broad it’ll prove unworkable. I wish there was some kind of ant-sex Republican mission statement. What’s there end-game? Sex in marriage only and no representations of it in the public domain at all? I’m as fascinated and confused as I’m terrified.