3 Porn Based Urban Legends

In the quest for spectacle porn's not above making stuff up.

This post is sponsored by SkinVideo, the world's largest repository of adult content. Join now for $14.95 a month.

Charged with shooting hundreds of hours of hours of hardcore sex each year the sticky valley isn’t beyond making stuff up to keep things interesting. Though cynics claim it’s all been done before, even pervs are regularly surprised by pornographers inventiveness. Many non-coprophilics where shocked to see Max Hardcore put his recently anally ensconced cock directly into a woman mouth for the first time a decade ago, and when I saw Skeeter Kerkove putting 164 into his then-wifes ass my preconceptions about 160 chopsticks being the utensil-in-the-ass ’speed of light’ were shattered.

Unfortunately porn’s still spreading ideas that range from questionable to outrageous. Here are three which need to be ended now.

Clit slapping
Given that there are only three orifices on a human you can park a penis in (excluding that girl I dated with the glass eye) it’s not surprising that one of the favored porn moves is adding a novel interpretation to basic three position sex (There are only three distinct sexual positions outside zero gravity or a swimming pool. You’re either facing each other, facing away from each other or at it sideways. The rest is arm movements and various ways of standing up or falling over.)

Slapping the cheeks with the cock is the dumbest variation currently popular, it’s not as if slapping a woman with a sausage has ever been a fetish outside Frankfurt, and I’ve never met a guy who liked to tap his knob to orgasm - but at least it doesn’t hurt.

Clit slapping, the porn stunt where frantic oral sex is punctuated with a three or four finger jab to the lady junk, is teaching a generation of teenagers a trick that’s going to lead to a lot of them hearing ‘Christ that fucking hurts you asshole!’ during what should be a tender moment.

Sure some people like it rough, but some guys like to be kneed in the balls and you don’t see that in many mainstream porn movies. Clit slapping’s popularity is therefore totally bizzare.

Hard Fucking
Tenacious D immortalized it in song but porn missed the joke. For some reason your average male performer has one speed setting and it’s ‘Energizer’.

A hell-for-leather-all-out-sex-attack is something you learn while wanking to Rocco DVD’s and listening to Incubus before you try it with a partner to discover that it only works 10% of the time and half of that’s when she’s trying to deliberately finish you off (this is mainly a guy problem).

Pumping most women to a screaming orgasm achieved without any direct clitoral stimulation is as likely as Uri Geller owning-up to bending those spoons on his chair when we’re not looking. Why is it the core of every other sex scene?

Squirting
I’m going to get mail on this one so read this carefully or risk missing the point.

Porn movies have popularized female ejaculation to the point where you can now buy ‘All Girl Bukkake’ DVD’s. Worse yet, some women now worry that they’re missing out because they don’t squirt.

Fact: Some women can eject fluid when they come.

…but let’s not rush to call it female ejaculation.

Putting aside that there’s no reason for female ejaculation to have evolved and that women lack a prostate gland (calling the paraurethral glands the ‘female prostate’ doesn’t get round this) you also have to consider that when you catheterize a female ’squirter’ you find that what’s being squirted comes from her bladder.

Pornographers know this too. On the set of a squirting movie you’ll notice an excess of empty Evian bottles and bathroom breaks coupled with a distinct lack of anyone who believes their watching women who fake for a living having the sex of their lives three takes in a row.

For people who claim that, like supposed psychic ability, squirting’s a ‘hidden’ capability we’ve lost over time, there’s still no way to address the fact that the half-litre fountains seen in porn films are too large to be anything but pee. If there is anything to female ejaculation it’s got to be a tiny amount of stuff from an organ we don’t yet understand. Drips and dribbles? Maybe. Mug-fulls at high velocity? Fuck off. (Interestingly when you test that fluid it turns out to be of a different composition than “normal” urea - but to call anything from the bladder ‘ejaculate’ rather than ‘pee’ is politics not science.)

Making women paranoid they’re missing out by doing something no-one can find a quantifiable reason for is silly. Believe that what’s sold in porn movies is anything other than a modified golden-shower is stupidity. Besides - women get to have kids. Can’t men at least maintain an exclusive on stuff shooting out of our junk when we’re excited?

The jizz-bizz will happily continue to sell unicorn shit to anyone willing to buy it. Pity the clit-slapped, hard fucked, non-ejaculating women growing up around this stuff who only realize they’ve been had when they’re 35. Isn’t porn supposed to be liberating?

64 comments ↓
  • darcy  11:56 am on April 11th, 2006

    re: female ejaculation

    I’m torn about this. On the one hand, I’m inclined to believe you. It makes no sense to me that it could be anything other than urine. It’d explain the sensation similar to having to pee when the g-spot is stimulated, no?

    But the reason I pause is that people I respect stand firmly behind the female-ejaculate-is-not-pee theory (like Good Vibes OG Deborah Sundahl, for example) and it’s hard to let it go. I’d be curious to see the hatemail you receive after this post, Sam.

  • rich  12:13 pm on April 11th, 2006

    Every one of my former lovers has enjoyed clit-slapping - albeit using her hand instead of mine so she could control the intensity. Maybe I just date freaks, but there may be a grain of truth to this one.

  • Sam Sugar  12:15 pm on April 11th, 2006

    Darcy, thanks for the feedback. To add fuel to the fire, the ‘G-spot’ isn’t even an agreed upon thing. We’ve swung from an era of female sexual denial to one of female sexual mysticism pretty quickly. If you published a book on the ‘H-spot’ tomorrow you’d find 100 people who swore it changed their lives.

    Look at breasts. Many people still believe that women’s and mens are fundamentally different in sensitivity when doctors say the range of sensation in men and women is the same.

    I’m not saying there’s nothing to female ejaculation but I am saying it can’t be of fundamental importance - else it wouldn’t be so ‘optional’ in terms of sexual health. Like UFO’s - the more publicity it gets the more people step up to claim a connection.

    I will accept some glandular response that produces an orgasmic secretion but spurting 200-900ml of fluid (as measured) compared to a mans 5ml (who has an ejaculatory system we fundamentally understand)? No way. If it were true there’d have to be somewhere ot keep all that fluid there just isn’t. Are we saying women who cum are mutants with special body parts?

    The responsibility for testable (as opposed to annecdotal) evidence is always on people making claims. Books full of unproven hypotheses are just elegant speculation. If women are producing such huge volumes of fluid there’s something seriously wrong with our understanding of their reproductive organs and why the hell would such a bizzare thing evolve anyway?If anything a huge gush of fluid would seem to act aginst sperm. Is it nature’s contracepticve?

    Oh yeah - why don’t other primates do it? They damn well so everything else sexually (homosexuality, oral etc.) Where’s the literature (pre late 20th century) describing such a natural phenomenon. Plenty of cultures have had very open attitudes to sexual pleasure for centuries but it’s not something in the great erotic literature of Japan or India. I find it hard to reconcile.

    Damn this is going to bring me some heat. Why can’t I just shut up…

  • Sam Sugar  12:18 pm on April 11th, 2006

    Rich - you date freaks. ;) Seriously you’re probably not giving it the wrist action I’m reffering to and some people do like… pretty much anything you cna imagine. I was making a point about the universality. It’s like suggesting all women like hair-pulling or snowballing.

  • Mia  2:00 pm on April 11th, 2006

    Normally, I don’t like the clit-slappage. Or spanking. Or really, really rough sex for that matter. But sometimes, you’re close to getting off and you need that extra oomph. And sometimes, that oomph is a clit slap. Or an ass spank. Or hair pulling. Or what have you. But it’s still firmly in that “don’t need it but if it happens at a critical moment, well I’ll take it” category.

    And the hype about the squirting thing has to stop. Seriously. If one more guy asks me if I squirt, I’m going to scream. What I don’t get is that guys (as in, the guys that check out my site and look at my “porn”) aren’t into golden showers but LOVE squirting. In my opinion, porn has a tendency to ruin stuff. Seriously. I can only imagine what the next big “thing” will be in porn.

  • alwaysarousedgirl  2:18 pm on April 11th, 2006

    I produce *something* when I come, no doubt about it. It’s totally different than pee, and as a mommy, I’m an expert on pee.

    I’ve watched the porn clips of girls ejaculating and nothing could be more different from my experience. Clearly they are faking their orgasms, and there is no way that allllll that fluid is anything other than pee.

    My two cents.

  • Sonja  3:29 pm on April 11th, 2006

    The spewing fountains of fluid are very hard to believe, but as i found with an enthusiastic G-spot massaging gent my body can produce enough to soak a couple of beach towels. Of course, I also ended up in the ER for dehydration afterwards. One extreme to another.

  • Seska  6:04 pm on April 11th, 2006

    Clit slapping - you referring to cock slapping the clit? If so then that is just silly. I like to get my vulva and asshole spanked during certain moments of raunchy sex but by a hand not a cock.

  • Elizabeth  6:27 pm on April 11th, 2006

    Where’d our gravatars go? Did I miss a memo?

  • evie  3:21 am on April 12th, 2006

    Yes! I so agree with you re Hard Fucking! It always looks so pointless, I think the importance of that in porn is one of the reasons I don’t like so much of what I see. It just seems to kill whatever eroticism they managed to work up. Most of the time the women look bored and their “responses” tend to be so automated it has nothing to do with what he’s doing. About the only positive side of the Hard Fucking phenomena is showing of the athletic ability of the guy - but that’s not really my kink.

    Clit Slapping, can work in the right situation, but to see it all the time? …

    Never squirted myself, never been with a women that did either. Though my boyfriend claims to have been with a woman who did. So who am I to say it doesn’t exist, but its not that common.

  • Pussy Talk  6:51 am on April 12th, 2006

    Sam, on squirting: THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU for some sane words on this insane, um, issue.

    I’ve been saying it’s pee for years, but if you’re a woman who doesn’t pee, everyone just assumes sour grapes.

    DTG xxoo
    Pussy Talk

  • zero kaneda  6:57 am on April 12th, 2006

    Sam- you forgot “the female orgasm.”

    (ducks.)

  • Pussy Talk  7:35 am on April 12th, 2006

    Sam, just to let you know—-I’ve linked to this post with a quote. Let the fireworks begin! hehe

    DTG xxoo

  • sapiophile  7:47 am on April 12th, 2006

    “(Interestingly when you test that fluid it turns out to be of a different composition than “normal” urea - but to call anything from the bladder ‘ejaculate’ rather than ‘pee’ is politics not science.)”

    I’m a squirter. I’ve closely examine (at a sensory level, not a chemical level) both pee (the stuff one generally releases into a toilet) and the-stuff-some-people-call-ejaculate (released at the moment of orgasm).

    They aren’t the same stuff. One has the texture of water, a color varying from nearly clear to dark yellow, and a uric smell. The other is somewhat slippery, more viscous than water, and tends to be cloudy white.

    I completely ready to believe (given my lack of medical training) that both of these substances are produced by the kidneys and stored in the bladder. (I’m also equally willing to believe that there’s an under-studied organ producing it. I’m a layman, I can’t argue with any of it.)

    I’m not ready to give these two substances an undifferentiated name. They are released at different times for different reasons, and they are a different substance. Calling them both “pee” is ridiculous.

    And then there’s the issue you calls “politics”, which I call choosing non-demeaning language. While the porn industry makes much of “squirting”, in the real world it is a shameful, difficult to manage problem, emotionally. Calling both *different* substances by the same (moderately vulgar) name further stigmatizes women like me.

  • sapiophile  7:56 am on April 12th, 2006

    Oh, and wanted to add one thing: I am also ready to believe that the women in the porn movies are peeing, or worse yet, faking it completely with hidden tubes.

    But just because THEY don’t, doesn’t mean I don’t. I don’t get cups and cups of liquid. I do get enough to soak a cloth diaper pretty thoroughly. (This isn’t a kink. Other parents will understand: after the babies grow out of them, diapers make awesome household cleaners, and I often place old dipes under my bottom when I masturbate so I won’t have to change the sheets.) So I’d guess the amount to be somewhere around 2-4 ounces. And it doesn’t squirt 4 feet in the air, although if the orgasm is really intense, it might come out with enough force to make it to my thighs. Usually it just kind of…um….gushes down between my legs.

    So the porn stars? Sure, fake. The whole phenomenon? Not so much.

  • Sam Sugar  8:23 am on April 12th, 2006

    All - thanks for the incredibly reasonable feedback. FYI I wasn’t saying know to a little ‘rough and tumble’ just the trend for the primary way of addressing the clit to be a jab. You never get to the heat of the moment if you start with that.

    Ironically - Gram just reviewed Nina’s female ejaculation video. I wonder if I can persuade Cynthera to do it while catheterized and online…

    zero - that femal orgasm shit’s just not worth commenting on. I’ve never been with a woman who’s had one so there…

  • Bacchus  9:11 am on April 12th, 2006

    Sam, I was disappointed to see your comments on female ejaculation. I think this is one place your posture as a pornographer has led you astray. To be sure, most of what is marketed as female ejaculation content is just re-treaded golden showers content. But in the bedroom, some women emit significant quantities (enough to drench a small towel) of fluid (wherever it comes from) that has properties (taste, smell, texture, viscousity) nothing like urine.

    Ever since I got into the sex blogging biz, it’s been a pet peeve of mine to hear pornographers going “It’s just pee.” Yeah, that’s true in the shit your buddies film and sell, maybe, but it’s not true in the bedrooms of the women who actually ejaculate. Call it politics if you will, but it seems insane to me to reinforce existing female apprehensions about their smell and taste by slapping a label like “pee” on a colorless fluid with a taste and smell and feel that’s nothing like (and much more pleasant than) pee.

  • Mike V.  9:26 am on April 12th, 2006

    Zero: Come on, man. You don’t see Sam debunking Bigfoot or UFOs here, do you?

  • Regina Lynn  9:30 am on April 12th, 2006

    I don’t pee when I come, unless the boyfriend isn’t telling me something. But I often cry. Not sad crying or even “ooo that was so emotional and deep and intimate I can’t help but weep at the glorious event that is us” crying. It’s full-on physical crying though — tears well up, leak out, jaw tenses, throat opens and constricts, the whole bit.

    This is disconcerting to some men, because frankly, I’m only attracted to nice men and nice men hate to feel like they made a woman cry.

    And yet the one thing I’ve not seen in porn is “spontaneous” post-coital tears. Perhaps that’s next? Only in true porn-style, it will be much more copious than any actual sex could ever inspire…

  • Sam Sugar  10:18 am on April 12th, 2006

    sapiophile - allow me to clarify. The ‘different composition’ is a minute fractional difference. It’s ‘almost’ identical to pee. Tiny differences don’t make it any more inherently special than the pee a man takes after sex when there are traces of hormones in his reporductive tract

    It comes from the bladder and does so even when catheterized squirters empty their bladders immediatly before squirting.

    So it’s almost identical to pee in composition and it comes from the bladder. Call it what you will but pee’s pretty standard and not unkind. The fact it’s not yellow and smelly doesn’t mean anything. When people drink alot they can pee stuff that looks like clean water. If, as research seems to suggest, it’s coming from a part of the bladder we don’t normally empty in the bathroom, it’s reasonable to think it might be cloudy or otherwise unusual.

    There’s no ’secret’ organ capable of producing large quantities of fluid and more importantly, no evolutionary reason for such a thing to exist. It might well be something that happens to some people during sex but that doesn’t mean the mechanism’s sexual. If I like to pee on my partner does that give pee some biological sexual significance? The fluid squirters produce needn’t be anything to do with the human sexual process.

    If some women experience an unusual form or incontinence at orgasm it doesn’t make them bad people nor somehow ’special’. Perhaps they just lose control of their bladder when they come and the pee that comes out is tinged with the sex-hormones coursing through their body. Occams razor.

  • Sam Sugar  10:20 am on April 12th, 2006

    Reginna - I cry when I come too. Firstly relief. Then at the cost of a professional servicing. It’s emotional.

  • Sabrina  10:22 am on April 12th, 2006

    I just wish guys (and women, honestly) would stop making such a big deal over whether or not you squirt.

    I don’t. It’s not a lack of G-spot stimulation, it’s definitely not that I’m insufficiently orgasmic. I just don’t squirt. I don’t really feel motivated to set aside entire three-day weekends to force it, either. If it happens, fine, if not, I have no complaints.

    There are people now who will try to make you feel doubtful and inferior about your orgasms. I have the comfort level to brush it off, but what about all these women really exploring sex for the first time at whatever age, that now have that doubt in the back of their minds when they orgasm? That’s no way to live.

    zero - Just because you’ve never had a female orgasm doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist…

  • sapiophile  10:35 am on April 12th, 2006

    The evolutionary argument doesn’t fly. I’m not arguing for the existence of such an organ — damned if I know — but you merely saying there’s “no reason” for it is not an argument AGAINST it. First of all, evolution doesn’t work on reason, it works on random mutations that are selected (by bestowing an accidental reproductive advantage) for by environmental conditions. Such mutations can very well be accompanied by apparently “useless” pieces that stick around because other traits associated with the mutation are useful. Also, it is awfully hard to tell what “use” traits might have had in our distant ancestors that continue to live on well past their usefulness because their existence doesn’t *hinder* fitness. So that fact that you, a layman, can’t see a “use” for female ejaculation at orgasm or some vestigal organ, does not constitute a valid argument against it. Heck, what evolutionary advantage is conferred by peeing at orgasm? There must be one, if it exists, right? Or heck, the advantage of female orgasm at all, a *much* disputed topic.

    Anyway, I’m interested in a citation for your reference about the minimal composition differences in “ejactulate” vs. urine. You didn’t include one, so I can’t refute it directly. I can only say that there has to be some explanation for the very evident sensory differences in smell, test, texture, viscosity and appearance. Even if, as you claim (again, without citation) there’s research suggesting some “part of the bladder we don’t normally empty” that accounts for the difference, there still has to be some chemical/physical difference in the fluid to account for a difference in sensory properties. Until you come up with research that explains it, I consider this to continue to be an open issue, no matter how empathically you suggest that your blog closes it.

    You speak here with a lot of authority, no data, and a hypothesis that fails to account for exceptions.

  • sapiophile  10:38 am on April 12th, 2006

    And I’m baffled as to how you can quote Occam’s Razor at me in the same post where you claim that there’s some special part of the bladder that isn’t normally emptied that turns clear or yellow pee into cloudy white.

  • sapiophile  10:39 am on April 12th, 2006

    Wait, I was confused. We’re arguing about the existence of female orgasms?!?

    Okay, you’re just a troll then. All done.

  • Sam Sugar  10:48 am on April 12th, 2006

    sapiophile - here’s a deal. You name a piece of the human organism and I’ll tell you why it evolved. Evolution isn’t directed by reason but it doesn’t evolve complicated useless structures because such unadventageous mutations don’t get passed on.

    As for composition - try this: http://www.drgspot.net/feandbph.htm

    They actually refer to it as ‘beer piss’.

    See also:

    Berkow, Samuel G. “The corpus spongeosum of the urethra: its possible role in urinary control and stress incontinence in women,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 65: 346-351, 1981.

    Bohlen, J. G. “‘Female ejaculation’ and urinary stress incontinence,” The Journal of Sex Research, 18: 360-363. (IASHS)

    Dorschner, W. and Stolzenburg, J. U. “A new theory of micturition and urinary continence based on histomorphological studies” and “The musculus ejaculatorius: a newly described structure responsible for seminal emission and ejaculation,” Utologia Internationalis, 53 (1):34-7, 1994.

    Freese, M. P., and Levitt, E. E. “Relationships among intervaginal pressure, orgasmic function, parity factors, and urinary leakage”, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13: 260 - 268, 1984.

    Zaviacic, M., Dolezalova, S., Holoman, I. K., Zaviacicova, A., Mikulecky, M. and Brazdil, .. “Concentrations of fructose in female ejaculate and urine: a comparative biochemical study,” The Journal of Sex Research, 24: 319 - 325, 1988.

    (NB. Read the post again. I’m not denying female producion of fluid. I’m denying that it’s an ejaculation in the sense we use the word to describe semen and I’m convinced it’s coming out of the bladder which has no currently known sexual function. Maybe some women’s kidneys go crazy and produce something odd during arousal but until that’s know we can only go on the very little science that’s been done and that’s what I’ve quoted).

  • The Girl  10:49 am on April 12th, 2006

    Personally I think that gushing and dripping are underrated. (Speaking as one who needs no towels on the bed, but gets exceedingly wet, thank you very much).

    As for clit-slapping: if a man ever attempted to do that to me, he’d get a fucking hard kick in the gonads. (Speaking as one who is ultra-sensitive in that area and can barely stand a gentle finger let alone a hard rub/slap).

    Finally, I agree about how most porn perpetuates an unreality with all the hard fucking that is going on onscreen: time for some real sex I think. Though saying that, I am quite partial to a hard fuck. (Speaking as a woman who regularly climaxes from penetration and not (often) from clitoral stimulation).

  • Sam Sugar  10:55 am on April 12th, 2006

    So Girl will you, ahem, marry me? ;)

  • Estockholmo  11:23 am on April 12th, 2006

    My wife and one previous girlfriend both ejaculate regularly during certain types of orgasm (deep vaginal rather than clitoral) and in both cases the fluid smells, feels and tastes (one weird experience, okay) different from urine. Whether the basis of the fluid is produced in the bladder, I don’t know, but the total of it is not “pee”. I agree that probably 90-95% of squirt porn is faked (either pumped full of liquid, or forced squirt of urine) but the phenomenon exists, and predated the current fad by several years. And it is a squirt! Girlfriend was only a few teaspoons, but wifey often drenches the bed/towel.
    When it comes to sexual research precluding certain female sexual responses, need we mention Freud et al? “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”
    And when it comes to bodily organs, ear lobes?

  • sapiophile  11:27 am on April 12th, 2006

    Thanks for the interesting article from Dr. Perry. Unfortunately, although he references a study, he doesn’t give details. He does, however, present a much more compelling argument than you do, without relying on the specious “evolution” argument.

    I main point, though, was on the use of the word “pee” as being both needlessly imprecise and also needlessly stigmatizing. Therefore it interested me to note that Dr. Perry and his youthful compatriots coined their own phrase, “beer piss”. The existence of this alternate term points to a social need to distinguish between different types of fluid one might emit from the bladder.

    It was also interesting to note that Dr. Perry is proposing that the fluid ejected during a female orgasm is NOT just “beer piss” or just “pee” but, “beer piss” combined with paraeurethral secretions containing glucose, etc. Your claim of it being “just” pee is not supported by him. While he didn’t get into the sensory properties of the paraurethral secretions, it strikes me as possible that they are cloudy white, slippery and viscous; if a little bit of very white, slippery viscous fluid mixed with a much larger amount of watery odorless nearly clear “beer piss”, the result might very well be what I’ve observed: a slightly cloudy slightly viscous slightly slippery fluid that is clearly not “pee”.

    At any rate, your fallacious call on evolutionary arguments notwithstanding, I stand by my assertion that “pee” is neither an accurate nor appropriate word for the substance resulting from real-life (non-porn-actors) squirters.

  • Jimbo  11:30 am on April 12th, 2006

    What about the Donkey Punch, Burrowing Skunk, Abraham Lincoln and The Rusty Trumpet? Are these fake too?

  • zanderz  12:13 pm on April 12th, 2006

    Thank you for realistic discussions of these acts. I still say that “ass-to-mouth”, alluded to in your opening comments, is just about the worst, when you graph it for frequency of appearance and disgustingness and health risk. I know that the actors have likely had several enemas before those scenes were shot, but still. Eiw.

  • Sam Sugar  1:07 pm on April 12th, 2006

    Jimbo - I’m doing a piece on Yeti’s who squirt, Alien’s probing squirters and the squirting slaves who built the pyramids (the squirt was used to ‘energize’ the crytals obviously).

    zanderz - ass-to-mouth is disgusting before about 2 O’clock in the afternoon.

    sapiophile - OOGHA BOOGAH WANGA BANGO! Please argue with that. Humorlessly. And what’s the evolutionary use of squirt again? I bet you’re not even a Christian. I SMITE YOU!

  • cibbuano  1:55 pm on April 12th, 2006

    Great post - I despise all those bizarre sex practices that are prevalent these days. Have you noticed that when the male star comes, he usually does it from jerking off himself? In mainstream porn, I don’t think the female or the male stars are really enjoying the sex.

    Bring back the fun!

  • Jen  4:41 pm on April 12th, 2006

    “They aren’t the same stuff. One has the texture of water, a color varying from nearly clear to dark yellow, and a uric smell. The other is somewhat slippery, more viscous than water, and tends to be cloudy white.”

    Slippery, more viscous than water, and tends to be cloudy white?

    You just perfectly described a fluid I sometimes get, too - not from the clit, though, from the *middle*. That fluid acts as a natural lubricant for the penis (which is why some women - myself included - have a lot of trouble with pre-clitorial-stimulation penetration. And I do notice, once in a while, a bit of a spurt when I orgasm, due to the muscles contracting, but it DOES come from the middle). I honestly forget what this fluid’s supposed to be called in the official sense, although in written porn, it tends to be referred to with all sorts of euphemisms, such as “honey” or “cream”, I’ve noticed. Why, I have no idea. I know for a fact (don’t ask) that it is virtually tasteless. Kind of like how I always imagine unflavored gelatin to taste like. I can only laugh at how I imagine an entire generation of guys who grew up on written porn that describes such fluid as “sweet nectar” will react to REAL oral sex.

    Seriously, though. Are you absolutely, positively, 100% sure BEYOND A DOUBT that this “female ejaculate” you describe does not at least include some of that “nectar”? Because it sounds an awful lot like it does.

    Side note: I think it odd that people still refer to the G-spot as if it were a mystical Shangri-la of sexual gratification. It’s not THAT hard to know it’s there (albeit the exact spot may be harder to actually pinpoint); chances are, if you’re a woman who’s had a halfway decent orgasm before, regardless of what form of stimulation you used to get it, you’ve felt the nerves in that area act up. The path sexual stimulation travels up (and, from what I can tell, the placement of the “G-spot” is somewhere along this same one) is called the vagus nerve, and it’s a nerve that runs up the front of the body (now you know why some people like to do it “doggy style”! That position makes it easier to hit that very nerve). If you’ve had a good orgasm, you might recall feeling some sensation of some sort up there. I’ve noticed it even with purely clitorial stimulation, on plenty of occasions.

    One thing I noticed recently when I saw a clip from a lesbian porno was the oral sex looked like one of the gals was a cat washing the other! That doesn’t look like it’s all that satisfying.

    I don’t get this “need for speed” in porn. What ever happened to the almost-agonizingly-but-ultimately-ecstasy-inducingly slow sex building into a crazy-good climax!? Seriously. Way sexier.

    Written porn has some weirder stuff, though, to the point where I wonder where all that money for sex ed REALLY goes. For instance, the hymen being like halfway up - um, no, men. It’s not. It’s at the front! For an even weireder/funnier good time, Google “Mpreg”. Male pregnancy. I swear I’m not kidding. It’s a fetish, albeit one of a romantic add-on for the sex. What’s scary is that apparently, some young girls are writing this stuff and (wait for it) ACTUALLY BELIEVE that men can get pregnant (those gals listed everything from the pancreas to the bladder to the butt cheeks as places for the baby to grow in, which makes me frankly weep for the current state of our biology classes). Scary!

    -Jen

  • Hel  5:06 pm on April 12th, 2006

    Sam-How did male nipples evolve?

  • sapiophile  5:20 pm on April 12th, 2006

    I’m pretty broken up that you think I’m humorless. I’m definitely going to need therapy to get over this one.

  • jim  7:15 pm on April 12th, 2006

    As for the squirting, I know it does exist, and that it isnt urine. but I do agree the fountain folks have to have a lot of urine in it. My gf/bh creates a massed cone of cold. I would say at most there is a teaspoon, but probably less. but it is such a fine spray, that not only is it slick, but the temperature is very low. It is odd, but I find it very reassuring, as I know when she orgasms..

  • Ellie  7:18 pm on April 12th, 2006

    Nice AMA style, Sammy, accurate bibliographies make me hot ;)

  • ell  8:23 pm on April 12th, 2006

    The clitoris isn’t essential to reproduction but it exists. I think it’s foolhardy to believe that we know all there is to know about the human body. It’s only been eight years since Melbourne urologist, Dr Helen O’Connell for the first time ever accurately described the true structure of the clitoris - up until then we’d been informed by Gray’s Anatomy - drawings based on the cadavers of three females, and unquestioned for many, many years.

    I think one of the biggest myths that porn portrays is that “more and harder is always better” thereby turning sex into either a sporting endurance event or a pantomime where all the acts are exaggerated so the folk up the back can see… In real life lots of women squirt, some squirt a lot of fluid, probably few would squirt anything like women we see in porn. Lots of women, me included, like hard fucking, but not just hard fucking all the time, I like the occasional spank as much as the next girl but in porn that “Wake up clit” type jabby action you describe is usually combined with a bit of spitting and the old three seconds of pussy eating with the pointy tongue routine. It’s just dull and bland. And more of it is just dull and bland. Perhaps that is the greatest porn myth - that sex is dull and bland?

  • Sam Sugar  2:49 am on April 13th, 2006

    Jen - I’m with you.

    Hel - sex is determined after nipples develop in the womb (I wrote ‘evolve’ but cut me a break. He said evolve. I know nipples dont evolve on people - though they did evolve for our species. Christ some people) . Men have them for that reason.

    El - the clitoris isn’t a redundant organ. If there was no evolutionary benefit to the clitoris it wouldn’t have persisted. As sex is used for more than reproduction the benefits conffered by the clitoris might not be reproductive at all. Women without clits can still orgasm (many circumcised women do) but an organ designed to promote pleasure and the release of hormones might not be sexual. This page makes a case for just that approach http://www.youngerthanyourage.com/13/clitoral.htm

    I’m totally down with the clit but I’ve not seen a convincing argument for the need to squirt. I’ve seen thousands for the clit. To say that the squirting’s a mystery like the clit isn’t fair to clits, or science, at all…

  • evie  3:32 am on April 13th, 2006

    All this talk about female ejaculation - I knew I had done some reading on this before. The latest theory is that it is not pee. Its not produced by the kidneys or the bladder, but by the Skene’s gland which is found in the urethra.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skene’s_gland

  • Daryl G.  3:38 am on April 13th, 2006

    I think that the barrage of comments I’ve read that support what I was going to say (how not necessarily wrong, but inaccurate, this article can be) negates the need for me to explain why.

    You can’t blanket your opinions over everybody out there and say any exception is for freaks or perverts only. It’s people like you that make honestly normal people feel guilty about things they shouldn’t, which leads to bad relationships and personal insecurity.

    This article? Perverted. Much more perverse than any porn I’ve seen, and since this is on the internet, that speaks volumes.

  • hludens  5:31 am on April 13th, 2006

    Nipples don’t evolve. Species do. ie embryological development is not “evolution”.

    mercy

  • Sam Sugar  12:40 pm on April 13th, 2006

    Evie - I read about skenes glands. They (plural) might contribute something but given how little we know about the male prostate the certainty of belivers in giving them the credit for female ejaculate seems premature to me. Calling them the male prostate is also a little dodgy.

    Here’s something easier to trust:

    http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2495

    As I said orignally the volume and source of fluid is my issue. Not the existance of some form of female ejaculation. Half a litre of fluid can’t come from any gland I’ve ever heard of. The bulk of the fluid is from the kidneys (as can be show by catheterizing squirters).

  • Jen  1:25 pm on April 13th, 2006

    “The clitoris isn’t essential to reproduction but it exists.”

    I seem to recall something (I think in a TLC doc about hermaphrodites) about all humans starting out the same in the womb, and then developing into one sex or another due to hormonal triggers.

    Hence, we share some of the same basic structures, such as nipples existing on men despite the fact that they’re not meant to lactate (though they can in rare cases, it’s usually very small amounts). The clitoris’ external physical structure is the “base” as it were, for the development of the penis.

    However, the main sexual organs in a woman are internal and connected to the falopian tubes, which are connected in turn to the uterus, and then the vaginal opening. They have no connection to the urethra. The main male sexual organs, which produce sperm, are connected to the penis.

    Women do not have testicles, and the ovaries are not connected to the clitoris. Hence, they do not ejaculate in the same EXACT sense as men do.

    Of course, men can lactate - but they only do it in very small amounts. It’s possible women could ejaculate fluid WITHOUT sperm, of course, the fluid sperm travels in, in small amounts as well.

    However, I still think from the amount and especially description given, I can’t rule out that what you described came from the vaginal opening, at least in part.

    Also, it’s worthy of note that when a man lactates, it’s at least partially caused by an excess of estrogen. When women grew facial hair that is thick, it’s usually attributed to either higher levels of testosterone (for instance, with certain forms of steroids), or a dive in the amount of estrogen (as can happen when a woman hits menopause, of course).

    So I would have to wonder if women who had that kind of gland actually active in their clit (assuming that is in fact what it is) might have a bit of excess testosterone in their systems. (This need not be bad OR good, just an observation. After all, testosterone is intimately connected with sexuality).

    - Jen

  • Madeline Glass  2:59 pm on April 13th, 2006

    I don’t care what it is or where it comes from or why it sometimes happens when I have an orgasm.

    It feels fucking great.

    Thanks and goodnight!

  • Ms Naughty  5:17 pm on April 13th, 2006

    There’s so many other things you could add to the “stupid porn sex acts” list. Like cum swapping. Or double anal. Or fishhooking. Even facial cumshots look stupid to me. So much mainstream porn seems to be turning into a freakshow. I pity anyone who takes it as sex education.

    There may be one good thing about the rise of female ejaculation in porn. At least it’s showing female orgasm (or something equivalent to it). Until recently, a woman’s orgasm wasn’t considered terribly necessary: think of how many Vivid movies feature the actress constantly moaning but never quite getting there… until the guy comes and it’s all over.

    Misogyny aside, one of the reasons for this may have been that pornographers felt that you couldn’t visually “prove” a woman had come, so they dispensed with the whole unpleasant issue.

    Squirting (real or otherwise) has offered a way to produce the required visual effect, so that may be why it’s suddenly popular. If nothing else, at least we get the see the girls come.

    Thus, my optimistic self sees the rise of squirting as a step forward for porn - albeit a kind of wobbly step in the usual slightly insane, porny way of things.

    OK, back to your regularly scheduled female ejaculation argument…

  • Sam Sugar  12:27 am on April 14th, 2006

    Jen - good points all. As I remember the clitoris develops before the penis is differentiated (as do labia - hence the line on mens balls marking where they join to form the ball-sack). Given how specialized the clit seems to be (which I believe has a higher concentration of nerve endings than the male glans) it would surprize me if there was widespread redundancy. I guess more reading’s in order…

  • Rose  12:37 am on April 14th, 2006

    Thank you !!!! for pointing out that clit slapping is totally dumb

    I have added a link to your blog on my blog — hope that is ok

  • Big Lou  1:30 pm on April 17th, 2006

    In regards to female ejaculations. At 58 I can honestly say I have “known” quite a few women. Out of all of them, only two ever ejaculated. One released a bit of fluid once after very significant foreplay.

    However, there was one woman that could eject significant amounts of fluid that was decidedly NOT urea. Her ex-husband enjoyed golden showers and she was sure that the two experiences felt totally different to her.

    At the time, I asked my MD for an explanation. He mentioned wall tissue in the area near the bladder that could contract and expel fluid/secretions from that area.

    Whatever the explanation, we discovered this ability by accident and worked it often up until we seperated two years later. Just a note, when she did “ejaculate” two things would happen. One, she would roll over and take a rief nap in order to recover. Second, little blood vessels on her facial cheeks would burst under her skin. The burst blood vessels are called “pehteekeeye” (phonetic spelling).

    Keep up the interesting work.

  • NotMyRealName  5:56 am on April 22nd, 2006

    For the record, I’m a female ejaculator. It is NOT pee- I pee before and after sex (reduces the risk of UTI’s, and anyway, I don’t want to pee during sex, and usually need to after). The fluid is clear, not yellow, and it smells and tastes different than pee, or regular female wetness. For me, at least, it’s a STRONG smell, too- and it tended to stain the towels so I’d have to wash them twice, or risk using them after a shower and smell like pussy all day, which isn’t so great…

    There is absolutely no way that I could have a pre-sex tinkle, and then within 10 minutes “pee” enough to soalk through 5 or 6 towels, then need to pee again in half an hour. Not a happening thing- you’re going to have to take my word on it. And the ejection velocity in some of the movies dosen’t seem too off, either- I haven’t seen myself, of course, but there was one interesting evening where I came so hard on my lover it splashed off his stomach and hit me strait up the nose.

    He was slightly offended when I started laughing hysterically mid-orgasm, but when I told him what happend, gasping for air, laughing, AND cumming at the same time, he started laughing too. It was a fun, happy evening :)
    Also, for the record- my ex did not like this quirk of my anatomy, because the inevitable wet spot, and mid-sex towel management.

  • Sam Sugar  11:59 pm on April 23rd, 2006

    NotMyRealName - read the links I dropped into the comments you’ll see that when squirters are catheterized - after emptying their bladders - the fluid produced can still be shown to come from the bladder. That’s all I said, in addition to doubting (though not outright denying) the blader can or would produce additional fluid during sex for some unknown reason. The ‘it’s not yellow and smelly argument’ doesn’t mean it’s not pee. It might not be but that’s got little to do with it. Pee can be clear and odorless too.

    As for the ‘ejection velocity’ - if it’s not coming out of your bladder (as I am sure it is) - where are the muscles which do all this ejaculating in a woman from? If it’s going up your nose something must be pushing it out with some vigour…

    I really need my own ‘Pornbusters’ show.

  • TGP: Fine Pornography Since 2006 » Blog Archive » Sugarbowl - 4/12
  • Mooiness! » Porn is not real
  • sodamncool.com » Blog Archive » 4 For the Faithful
  • Radical Vixen » Blog Archive » Sugasm #54
  • Master Fitz and His brat » Blog Archive » Sugasm #54
  • Sex, Females, Sex, Sex, Sex, 1SexBlog.com » Blog Archive » Sugasm #54
  • Retro Sex Blog » Sugasm 54
  • Sugasm 54 « The Erotic Journal of Juno Henry
  • Model-Chat » Sugasm 54 - I’m a pick!
  • Talk To Vanessa » Blog Archive » Sugasm #54
  • Adele Haze’s “Spanking Model Speaks” » Sugasm-54
  • SugarBank is 1 year old today

This Month's Top 10

Recent Comments

Top Commenters